Fictional matter — created for portfolio demonstration. No real parties, courts, or facts.
exhibit plaintiff

San Bernardino County Superior Court

Reyes v. Pacific Western Logistics, Inc., et al. · No. CIVDS2401847 (FICTIONAL)

Litigation Timeline (Exhibit)

2026-04-15

[ATTORNEY NAME — STATE BAR NO. ######]
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS LINE 1]
[CITY, STATE ZIP]
[PHONE | EMAIL]
Attorneys for Plaintiff MARIA REYES


SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

MARIA REYES,                                    Case No. CIVDS2401847 (FICTIONAL)
                        Plaintiff,
        v.                                      LITIGATION TIMELINE — EXHIBIT A

PACIFIC WESTERN LOGISTICS, INC.,
a California corporation; JOHN DOE;
and DOES 1 through 50,
                        Defendants.

LITIGATION TIMELINE — EXHIBIT A

Case: Reyes v. Pacific Western Logistics, Inc., et al.
Case No.: CIVDS2401847 (FICTIONAL)
Prepared: April 15, 2026


PHASE 1 — PRE-LITIGATION (November 2023 – June 2024)

DateEventSourcePhase
2023-11-04T-bone collision at Milliken Ave. / I-15 interchange, Ontario, CA; semi-truck operated by John Doe (Pacific Western Logistics) runs red light and strikes plaintiff’s vehicle broadside at highway approach speedCHP Collision Report No. [######] (FICTIONAL)Incident
2023-11-04Plaintiff transported by ambulance to Arrowhead Regional Medical Center (“ARMC”) ED; admitted with acute cervical and lumbar pain; discharged same day with cervical collarARMC RecordsMedical
2023-11-04Bystanders at scene provide statements to CHP indicating truck did not slow before impact (unverified — to be confirmed through investigation)CHP ReportLiability
2023-11-07Plaintiff placed on unpaid medical leave by employer [FACILITY NAME — REDACTED] due to lifting restrictionsEmployer RecordsDamages
2023-11-08Initial follow-up visit with primary care physician; referral for MRI studiesPCP RecordsMedical
2024-01-22MRI confirms C5-C6 and L4-L5 disc herniations; treating physician recommends aggressive physical therapy and re-evaluation for surgical candidacyMRI ReportMedical
2024-02-05Physical therapy program initiated — 3×/weekPT RecordsMedical
2024-06-18Client intake call with firm; potential FMCSA hours-of-service violation identifiedIntake MemoPre-Lit
2024-06-20Conflict check completed — no disqualifying conflict foundConflict Check MemoPre-Lit
2024-06-25Litigation hold / spoliation prevention letter sent to Pacific Western Logistics, Inc.Firm RecordsPre-Lit

PHASE 2 — PLEADINGS (July 2024 – September 2024)

DateEventSourcePhase
2024-07-15Complaint filed in San Bernardino County Superior Court — Case No. CIVDS2401847 (FICTIONAL). Causes of action: (1) Negligence; (2) Negligent Entrustment; (3) Vicarious LiabilityCourt DocketPleadings
2024-07-16Summons issuedCourt DocketPleadings
2024-08-01Statement of Damages (CCP § 425.11) served on defendantsProof of ServicePleadings
2024-08-28Pacific Western Logistics, Inc. served with summons and complaintProof of ServicePleadings
2024-08-30John Doe served with summons and complaintProof of ServicePleadings
2024-09-03Pacific Western Logistics, Inc. and John Doe file Answers; general denial; affirmative defense of comparative fault assertedCourt DocketPleadings

PHASE 3 — WRITTEN DISCOVERY (January 2025 – Present)

DateEventSourcePhase
2025-01-10Plaintiff serves Form Interrogatories Set One (DISC-001), Special Interrogatories Set One (30 interrogatories), and Requests for Production Set One (22 demands) on all defendantsDiscoveryDiscovery
2025-02-11Defendants serve responses to all three sets of written discoveryDiscoveryDiscovery
2025-02-20Defendants serve Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and RFPs on PlaintiffDiscoveryDiscovery
2025-03-04Plaintiff sends meet-and-confer letter re: deficient responses to SROG Nos. 14 and 22 (driver hours-of-service)M&C LetterDiscovery
2025-03-21Defendants serve supplemental SROG responses — paralegal review determines Qs 14 and 22 remain deficientSupplementalDiscovery
2025-03-22Plaintiff’s responses to defendants’ written discovery servedDiscoveryDiscovery
2025-03-25Plaintiff sends second meet-and-confer letter disputing supplemental SROG adequacyM&C LetterDiscovery
2025-04-02Telephonic meet-and-confer re: RFP ELD data and maintenance records — no resolutionM&C LogDiscovery
2025-06-18Deposition of John Doe (driver) taken; hours-of-service log produced at deposition showing 14-hour prior day — KEY LIABILITY FACTDeposition TranscriptDiscovery
2025-07-01Deposition transcript received; ordered for indexingTranscriptDiscovery

PHASE 4 — MOTION PRACTICE (January 2026 – Present)

DateEventSourcePhase
2026-01-15Plaintiff sends final meet-and-confer letter — SROG Nos. 14 and 22 — no resolutionM&C LetterMotions
2026-02-10Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories Set One filed; sanctions of $1,950 requested under CCP § 2023.030Court DocketMotions
2026-04-25Defendants’ opposition to Motion to Compel dueCalendarMotions
2026-05-02Plaintiff’s reply ISO Motion to Compel dueCalendarMotions
2026-05-15Hearing on Motion to Compel — Dept. [##], 8:30 a.m.CalendarMotions

PHASE 5 — UPCOMING (May 2026 – 2027)

DateEventNotes
May 2026 (TBD)Trial-setting conferenceCourt to assign trial date
2026 (TBD)Expert designation cutoffsPlaintiff: accident reconstruction; biomechanics; medical
2026–2027 (TBD)Defense medical examination (CCP § 2032)Not yet noticed
Q1 2027 (anticipated)TrialPer TSC estimate

Exhibit prepared by: [PARALEGAL NAME]
Supervising Attorney: [ATTORNEY NAME — STATE BAR NO. ######]
Date: April 15, 2026

How this was made

Method

Extracted chronological events from the docket, medical record dates, discovery correspondence, and deposition transcript; Claude generated the initial timeline table and phase annotations; paralegal cross-referenced each entry against source documents and corrected two date errors.

Human judgment points

  • Decided to include the November 2023 bystander statements as a separate timeline entry flagged as 'unverified' rather than omitting them entirely — preserving them for potential impeachment value without overstating reliability
  • Chose to annotate the 14-hour driving day discovery separately from the deposition date to highlight it as a standalone liability event rather than just a deposition byproduct
  • Determined that the litigation timeline should use neutral caption-style language so it can serve as an exhibit in the motion to compel without requiring redrafting

Time

~1 hour AI-augmented vs ~3 hours traditional chronology assembly