Fictional matter — created for portfolio demonstration. No real parties, courts, or facts.
exhibit plaintiff

San Bernardino County Superior Court

Reyes v. Pacific Western Logistics, Inc., et al. · No. CIVDS2401847 (FICTIONAL)

Pleading Index / Case File Index

2026-04-15

[ATTORNEY NAME — STATE BAR NO. ######]
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS LINE 1]
[CITY, STATE ZIP]
[PHONE | EMAIL]
Attorneys for Plaintiff MARIA REYES


SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

MARIA REYES,                                    Case No. CIVDS2401847 (FICTIONAL)
                        Plaintiff,
        v.                                      PLEADING INDEX / CASE FILE INDEX

PACIFIC WESTERN LOGISTICS, INC.,
a California corporation; JOHN DOE;
and DOES 1 through 50,
                        Defendants.

PLEADING INDEX AND CASE FILE INDEX

Case: Reyes v. Pacific Western Logistics, Inc., et al.
Case No.: CIVDS2401847 (FICTIONAL)
Court: San Bernardino County Superior Court
Last Updated: April 15, 2026


SECTION 1 — PLEADINGS

#DocumentDate FiledBinder Vol./TabDigital PathStatus
1.1Complaint — Negligence; Neg. Entrustment; Vicarious Liability2024-07-15Vol. 1 / Tab 1/pleadings/001_complaint.pdfFiled
1.2Summons — Pacific Western Logistics, Inc.2024-07-16Vol. 1 / Tab 2/pleadings/002_summons_pwl.pdfIssued
1.3Summons — John Doe2024-07-16Vol. 1 / Tab 3/pleadings/003_summons_doe.pdfIssued
1.4Statement of Damages (CCP § 425.11)2024-08-01Vol. 1 / Tab 4/pleadings/004_stmt_damages.pdfServed
1.5Proof of Service — Pacific Western Logistics, Inc.2024-09-03Vol. 1 / Tab 5/pleadings/005_pos_pwl.pdfFiled
1.6Proof of Service — John Doe2024-09-03Vol. 1 / Tab 6/pleadings/006_pos_doe.pdfFiled
1.7Answer — Pacific Western Logistics, Inc.2024-09-03Vol. 1 / Tab 7/pleadings/007_answer_pwl.pdfFiled
1.8Answer — John Doe2024-09-03Vol. 1 / Tab 8/pleadings/008_answer_doe.pdfFiled

SECTION 2 — PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY TO DEFENDANTS

#DocumentServedResponsesBinder Vol./TabStatus
2.1Form Interrogatories — Set One (DISC-001)2025-01-102025-02-11Vol. 2 / Tab 1Complete
2.2Special Interrogatories — Set One (30 Qs)2025-01-102025-02-11Vol. 2 / Tab 2Deficient (Qs 14, 22)
2.3Requests for Production — Set One (22 demands)2025-01-102025-02-11Vol. 2 / Tab 3MTC Pending
2.4Defendants’ Responses to FROG Set One2025-02-11Vol. 2 / Tab 4Complete
2.5Defendants’ Supplemental SROG Responses (Qs 14, 22)2025-03-21Vol. 2 / Tab 5Still Deficient
2.6Defendants’ Responses to RFP Set One + Privilege Log2025-02-11Vol. 2 / Tab 6MTC Pending
2.7Notice of Deposition — John Doe2025-04-15Vol. 2 / Tab 7Completed 2025-06-18
2.8Deposition Transcript — John Doe2025-07-01Vol. 2 / Tab 8On File

SECTION 3 — DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY TO PLAINTIFF

#DocumentServedResponsesBinder Vol./TabStatus
3.1Defendants’ Form Interrogatories to Plaintiff2025-02-202025-03-22Vol. 3 / Tab 1Complete
3.2Defendants’ Special Interrogatories to Plaintiff2025-02-202025-03-22Vol. 3 / Tab 2Complete
3.3Defendants’ Requests for Production to Plaintiff2025-02-202025-03-22Vol. 3 / Tab 3Complete
3.4Plaintiff’s Production (medical records, billing, employment)2025-03-22Vol. 3 / Tab 4~400 pp. produced

SECTION 4 — MOTION PRACTICE

#DocumentFiledHearingBinder Vol./TabStatus
4.1Motion to Compel Further SROG Responses2026-02-102026-05-15Vol. 4 / Tab 1Pending
4.2Separate Statement ISO MTC2026-02-10Vol. 4 / Tab 2Filed
4.3Declaration of [ATTORNEY NAME] ISO MTC2026-02-10Vol. 4 / Tab 3Filed
4.4Defendants’ Opposition to MTC (anticipated)Due 2026-04-25Vol. 4 / Tab 4Pending
4.5Plaintiff’s Reply ISO MTC (anticipated)Due 2026-05-02Vol. 4 / Tab 5Pending

SECTION 5 — THIRD-PARTY RECORDS AND INVESTIGATION

#DocumentDateSourceBinder Vol./TabStatus
5.1CHP Collision Report No. [######]2023-11-04CA Highway PatrolVol. 5 / Tab 1On File
5.2CHP Supplemental Report (Traffic Signal Data)CA Highway PatrolVol. 5 / Tab 2PENDING
5.3ARMC Emergency Department Records2023-11-04Arrowhead Regional MCVol. 5 / Tab 3On File
5.4MRI Reports (C5-C6, L4-L5)2024-01-22[IMAGING CENTER — REDACTED]Vol. 5 / Tab 4On File
5.5Physical Therapy Records2024-02 to present[PT PROVIDER — REDACTED]Vol. 5 / Tab 5Ongoing
5.6ELD / ECM Data — John Doe TruckPacific Western (via discovery)Vol. 5 / Tab 6DISPUTED — MTC
5.7Driver Hours-of-Service Log2025-06-18Produced at DepositionVol. 5 / Tab 7On File
5.8Litigation Hold Letter to Pacific Western2024-06-25Firm RecordsVol. 5 / Tab 8On File

SECTION 6 — CORRESPONDENCE

#DescriptionDateBinder Vol./Tab
6.1Meet-and-Confer Letter — SROG Qs 14, 22 (First)2025-03-04Vol. 6 / Tab 1
6.2Meet-and-Confer Letter — SROG Qs 14, 22 (Second)2025-03-25Vol. 6 / Tab 2
6.3Meet-and-Confer Letter — RFP ELD Data2025-04-02Vol. 6 / Tab 3
6.4Meet-and-Confer Letter — SROG (Final)2026-01-15Vol. 6 / Tab 4

Index maintained by: [PARALEGAL NAME]
Supervising Attorney: [ATTORNEY NAME — STATE BAR NO. ######]
Last Updated: April 15, 2026

How this was made

Method

Generated initial index table by parsing docket export CSV with Claude; AI auto-populated document descriptions and cross-referenced against the physical file binder checklist; paralegal verified bates numbering and confirmed physical document presence.

Human judgment points

  • Decided to organize the index by category (pleadings, discovery, motions, correspondence) rather than strictly chronologically because the motion-practice section is the most actively accessed and a categorical structure reduces lookup time under time pressure
  • Chose to include a 'physical location' column referencing binder volume and tab numbers rather than digital path only, because this case file is maintained in both physical and digital formats for court submission
  • Determined that unproduced third-party records (CHP report supplements) should be listed as 'pending' with a placeholder row rather than omitted, so the index serves as an outstanding-items checklist as well

Time

~1 hour AI-augmented vs ~2.5 hours traditional manual indexing